AI Reasoning Evaluation — Self-Directed
I independently evaluated AI-generated reasoning outputs across mathematics, logic, and STEM, using structured rubrics to benchmark model performance. My workflow included prompt design, error documentation, and thorough response quality assessment for continuous LLM improvement. I provided detailed feedback to identify reasoning failures and logic issues for model developers. • Developed and refined custom evaluation rubrics for mathematical and logical assessment. • Benchmarked language model reasoning across multiple prompt scenarios and difficulty levels. • Documented error types and annotated logical inconsistencies for QA reporting. • Provided strategic feedback to inform iterative tuning and research directions.