Development of Multi-Dimensional Evaluation Rubrics for Historiographical Reasoning & LLM Training
Engineered a 4-stage, high-fidelity evaluation rubric to assess the ability of LLMs to synthesize complex historical narratives and socio-political theories (16th-century French Religious Wars and the formation of Modern Sovereignty). Designed 8+ rigorous criteria including "Textual Extraction," "Multi-Source Synthetic Reasoning," and "Cross-Verification" to eliminate AI hallucinations. Implemented a Dependency-based Logic System: Configured high-level analytical criteria (e.g., analyzing the 'Politique' ideology and 'Salic Law') as contingent upon the accuracy of primary source data extraction. Translated qualitative historiographical methodologies (Source Criticism) into a structured quantitative framework, establishing clear "Justification/Rationale" standards for each evaluation step.