Peer review and Scientific Reasoning
Led peer review and auditing tasks for large-scale AI evaluation projects. Applied and refined scoring rubrics to ensure consistent assessment of complex Q&A and reasoning outputs. Conducted guideline-based evaluations, answered clarification questions in project chats, and ensured cross-rater reliability across annotators. Provided detailed feedback on peers’ work, highlighting accuracy, clarity, and compliance issues. Drew on experience in teaching, supervision, and scientific communication to clarify rubric criteria and maintain high-quality standards. Delivered audit-ready outputs under strict deadlines, combining scientific subject-matter expertise with quality assurance precision.