LLM Response Quality Evaluation Framework Creator
I built and implemented a personal scoring rubric for evaluating LLM-generated outputs based on accuracy, tone, safety, and helpfulness dimensions. This framework was adopted by a 15-person annotation team as a reference for quality evaluation tasks. The process involved systematic analysis and iterative improvement of the rubric for high annotation consistency. • Facilitated LLM output evaluation for enhanced model performance • Directly improved consistency and inter-annotator agreement • Provided scalable rubric-based evaluation methodology • Used internal/proprietary tooling for evaluation tasks